UNITED KINGDOM
Tuesday, January 26, 2021, 07:00 (GMT + 9)
A new study has found that Scottish caught pelagic fish such as herring and mackerel have a low carbon footprint compared to other types of food production, making them a good food choice for the environmentally conscious consumer.
This study, just published, “The environmental impacts of pelagic fish caught by Scottish vessels”
was carried out by Frances Sandison as part of her PhD studies and
funded by the Scottish Pelagic Sustainability Group, Shetland Islands
Council, University of Aberdeen, University of the Highlands and
Islands, and Shetland Fish Producers’ Organisation.
Her study found that Scottish-caught pelagic fish have a lower carbon
footprint and environmental impact when compared to other seafood
products. This includes UK farmed salmon, which is 7.2 times higher, and
Norwegian caught cod and haddock, which are 3.5 and 3.9 times higher
than Scottish caught pelagic fish.
This extended her earlier finding at the NAFC Marine Centre
(which is part of the University of the Highlands and Islands) which
revealed that the carbon footprint of the Shetland mackerel trawl
fishery was much lower compared to land-based meat production, including
chicken, beef and pork. Seafood production in general has a lower
carbon footprint than land-based meat production.
Illustration
of system boundaries where the large boxed area represents this study's
system boundary and everything outside representing downstream events.
Shaded boxes indicate where background data was used. In terms of fuel,
engine oil and refrigerants, background data was used for their initial
production from raw materials. Primary data was used thereafter for
quantities consumed during the fishing phase. Arrows indicate direction
of pathway for resource use, with products indicated in square boxes and
processes in oval ones | Click image to enlarge
This confirms that sustainably managed Scottish pelagic fish represents a
climate smart food source that helps deliver targets for achieving net
zero carbon.
Frances Sandison says: “In Scotland we have access to a fantastically
low impact, highly nutritious, locally caught source of protein.
Compared to other meat sources the choice is clear for the
environmentally conscious consumer – we should be eating more local
pelagic fish.”
Component
analysis of LCA results for the Scottish Pelagic Fleet 2015–2017
showing the impact categories of Abiotic depletion (ADP), Abiotic
depletion of fossil fuels (ADPFF), Global warming (GWP), Ozone layer
depletion (ODP), Human toxicity (HTP), Fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity
(FETP), Marine aquatic ecotoxicity (METP), Terrestrial ecotoxicity
(TETP), Photochemical oxidation (POMF), Acidification (AP) and
Eutrophication (EP), with y axis beginning at 89.5 %. | Click image to
enlarge
Her environmental impact study also found that fuel consumption in the
fishing phase is the main contributor of carbon emissions. Enhancing
fuel efficiency through innovations in vessel design and fishing
practices, and a transition to alternative fuel sources are part of the
Scottish pelagic sector’s efforts to minimise emissions.
Ian Gatt, chairman of the Scottish Pelagic Sustainability Group,
said: “We congratulate Frances on the successful completion of her
research. For the Scottish pelagic sector there is a lot at stake with
climate change, given that mackerel and herring have an established
global trade that helps ensure food security as an affordable and
nutritious protein in many parts of the world. Scottish fishermen have
invested heavily in modern vessels and fish handling systems, and
processors in the latest equipment, to ensure a high quality, low carbon
footprint product that can be delivered to market in the most efficient
manner.
“As such, Scottish mackerel and herring production really do tick all
the right boxes when it comes to sustainability, nutrition, and low
carbon footprint.”